|
![]() |
Figure 1: Comparison between a spherical and an aspherical surface |
In the diagram above, the outline
of an aspherical profile is traced in comparison with spherical form
present in the middle of the lens. In the non-proportional
representation, it can be seen that the aspherical lens deviates at
the edge by approximately 1.5 mm from the spherical form. As
reference values for acceptable deviations from the desired surface
form, a global error of < 1 µm and a local error of < 0.1 µm
can be specified.
Picture 2 shows an example of an aspheric surface after polishing and before the final centering process. The lens here is still cemented to the workpiece mount. The reflections of light from two fluorescent tubes make it possible to clearly recognize the aspheric profile, comparable to the desired profile shown in the diagram.
| Picture 2 Aspheric lens surface, after polishing | ![]() |
The SUPER-SYMMAR-Series XL ASPHERIC , which has since been enlarged to four lenses, demonstrates in an impressive way what the effect of an aspheric surface has on the size of the lenses. The reduced lens size (see Picture 3) allows for smaller shutters and less glass, and in some cases reduces the weight in comparison to spherical lenses by a half. The performance data in contrast to these lenses in some cases even better, e.g., the maximum aperture which is larger by an f-stop and the larger angle of view.?
![]() |
SCHNEIDER-KREUZNACH Aspherical Lenses :
SUPER-SYMMAR SUPER-SYMMAR SUPER-SYMMAR SUPER-SYMMAR |
| Picture 3: Comparison of a traditional and new aspherical lens | foto@schneiderkreuznach.com |
|